Spectrofluorometric determination of cinacalcet hydrochloride: greenness assessment and application to biological fluids andin-vitrodissolution testing.

A facile, simple, green and sensitive spectrofluorometric method was developed for determination of the calcimimetic drug cinacalcet hydrochloride. It is used for the treatment of hyperparathyroidism. The drug showed high native fluorescence intensity at 320 nm after excitation at 280 nm. The method was linear over the range of 5.0-400.0 ng ml-1with excellent correlation (R2= 0.9999). Limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantitation (LOQ) values were 1.19 and 3.62 ng ml-1, respectively. The percentage recovery was found to be 100.42% ± 1.39 (n=8). The proposed method was successfully applied for determination of cinacalcet in spiked human plasma samples with % recoveries of (87.23 to 109.69%). Two recent greenness metrics (GAPI and Analytical Eco-Scale) were chosen to prove the eco-friendly nature of the method. Furthermore, the proposed method was successfully applied to dissolution study of commercial cinacalcet tablets. The interference likely to be introduced by some commonly co-administrated drugs such as metoprolol and itraconazole was studied; the tolerance limits were calculated.

[Use of cinacalcet in secondary hyperparathyroidism: assessment of nutritional, lipid and inflammatory status in chronic kidney disease]. / Uso de cinacalcet en hiperparatiroidismo secundario: evaluación del estado nutricional, lipídico e inflamatorio en enfermedad renal crónica.

Introduction: Introduction: observations in cell lines suggest that the use of cinacalcet could be associated with increase in body fat, inflammatory state, and alteration in lipid metabolism. However, when scaling the model to the clinical level, the occurrence of these effects is unknown. Objectives: to analyze the effect of cinacalcet therapy on anthropometric, inflammatory and lipid parameters in renal patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT). Methods: observational study with two approaches. The retrospective study included 89 patients who started cinacalcet treatment since 2018 with a maximum follow-up of 36 months. Body mass index (BMI) variables, waist circumference, tricipital skinfold, parathyroid hormone (PTH), and biochemical profile were analyzed. The prospective study included 52 patients who started cinacalcet treatment since 2020 with a 12-month follow-up. BMI, PTH, lipid profile, and PCR variables were analyzed. Results: in the retrospective study, BMI was 27 kg/m2, with 62 % overweight and 65 % of patients with high cardiovascular risk. Cinacalcet reduced PTH by 12 % after six months (p < 0.01) and serum calcium decreased by 3.4 % at the end of follow-up (p = 0.04). According to the prospective study, BMI was 26.8 kg/m2, with 60 % overweight. PTH decreased by 8.4 % after six months. Total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglycerides decreased by 6.8 %, 12.5 %, and 5.5 %, respectively, at the end of follow-up. Conclusions: the prevalent nutritional status is excess weight. In patients with SHPT, cinacalcet improves PTH control without causing changes in anthropometric, lipid, and inflammatory parameters.

Introducción: Introducción: observaciones en líneas celulares sugieren que el uso de cinacalcet podría asociarse con un aumento de grasa corporal y del estado inflamatorio y una alteración del metabolismo lipídico. Sin embargo, al escalar el modelo a nivel clínico se desconoce la ocurrencia de estos efectos. Objetivos: analizar el efecto de la terapia con cinacalcet sobre parámetros antropométricos, inflamatorios y lipídicos en pacientes renales con hiperparatiroidismo secundario (HPT2). Métodos: estudio observacional con dos aproximaciones. El estudio retrospectivo incluyó 89 pacientes que iniciaron tratamiento de cinacalcet desde el año 2018 con un seguimiento máximo de 36 meses. Se analizaron variables de índice de masa corporal (IMC), circunferencia de cintura, pliegue tricipital, paratohormona (PTH) y perfil bioquímico. El estudio prospectivo incluyó 52 pacientes que iniciaron tratamiento con cinacalcet desde el año 2020 con un seguimiento de 12 meses. Se analizaron variables de IMC, PTH, perfil lipídico y proteína C reactiva (PCR). Resultados: en el estudio retrospectivo, el IMC fue de 27 kg/m2, con un 62 % de exceso de peso y un 65 % de los pacientes con riesgo cardiovascular elevado. Cinacalcet redujo la PTH un 12 % luego de seis meses (p < 0,01) y el calcio sérico disminuyó un 3,4 % al final del seguimiento (p = 0,04). En el estudio prospectivo, el IMC fue de 26,8 kg/m2, con un 60 % de exceso de peso. La PTH disminuyó un 8,4 % luego de seis meses. El colesterol total, el colesterol LDL y los triglicéridos disminuyeron en un 6,8 %, 12,5 % y 5,5 %, respectivamente, al finalizar el seguimiento. Conclusiones: el estado nutricional prevalente es el exceso de peso. En pacientes con HPT2 cinacalcet mejora el control de la PTH sin provocar cambios en parámetros antropométricos, lipídicos e inflamatorios.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of cinacalcet vs. paricalcitol in the treatment of hyperparathyroidism secondary to chronic kidney disease.

INTRODUCTION: For the reduction of PTH levels, two classes of drugs are available in the Brazilian market: non-selective and selective vitamin D receptor activators and calcimimetics. Among the mentioned drugs, the SUS provides oral calcitriol, paricalcitol and cinacalcet. OBJECTIVES: Develop cost-effectiveness (CE) and budgetary impact (BI) analysis of cinacalcet versus paricalcitol for patients on dialysis with SHPT, from the perspective of SUS. METHODOLOGY: A decision tree model was constructed for CE analysis, which considered the outcome of avoided parathyroidectomy and a time horizon of 1 year. As for the BI analysis, two scenarios were considered, one of which was measured demand and other epidemiological, based on data from the Brazilian Society of Nephrology (BSN). RESULTS: The CE analysis showed that the use of cinacalcet results in one-off savings of R$1,394.64 per year and an incremental effectiveness of 0.08, in relation to avoided parathyroidectomy. The incremental CE ratio (ICER) was - R$ 17,653.67 per avoided parathyroidectomy for cinacalcet, as it was more effective and cheaper compared to paricalcitol. As for the BI analysis, it was estimated that the incremental BI with the expansion of the use of cinacalcet in the SUS will be between - R$ 1,640,864.62 and R$ 166,368.50 in the first year, considering the main and the epidemiological scenarios. At the end of 5 years after the expansion of use, an BI was estimated between - R$ 10,740,743.86 and - R$ 1,191,339.37; considering the same scenarios. CONCLUSION: Cinacalcet was dominant to avoid parathyroidectomies, being cost-effective.

Parathyroidectomy and Cinacalcet Use in Medicare-Insured Kidney Transplant Recipients.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Posttransplant hyperparathyroidism is common, and treatment practices are poorly characterized. The goal of this study was to examine the incidence, associations, and outcomes of posttransplant parathyroidectomy and calcimimetic use in a cohort of Medicare-insured US kidney transplant recipients. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: We used the US Renal Data System to extract demographic, clinical, and prescription data from Medicare Parts A, B, and D-insured patients who received their first kidney transplant in 2007-2013. We excluded patients with pretransplant parathyroidectomy. PREDICTORS: Calendar year of transplantation and pretransplant patient characteristics. OUTCOME: (1) Incidence of and secular trends in parathyroidectomy and cinacalcet use in the 3 years after transplant; (2) 90-day outcomes after posttransplant parathyroidectomy and cinacalcet initiation. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Temporal trends and pretransplant correlates of parathyroidectomy and cinacalcet use were assessed using proportional hazards models and multivariable Poisson regression, respectively. RESULTS: The inclusion criteria were met by 30,127 patients, of whom 10,707 used cinacalcet before transplant, 551 underwent posttransplant parathyroidectomy, and 5,413 filled≥1 prescription for cinacalcet. The rate of posttransplant parathyroidectomy was stable over time. By contrast, cinacalcet use increased during the period studied. Long dialysis vintage and pretransplant cinacalcet use were strongly associated with posttransplant parathyroidectomy and cinacalcet use. Roughly 1 in 4 patients were hospitalized within 90 days of posttransplant parathyroidectomy, with hypocalcemia-related diagnoses being the most common complication. Parathyroidectomy (vs cinacalcet initiation) was not associated with an increase in acute kidney injury. LIMITATIONS: We lacked access to laboratory data to help assess the severity of secondary/tertiary hyperparathyroidism. The cohort was limited to Medicare beneficiaries. CONCLUSIONS: Almost one-fifth of our study cohort was treated with parathyroidectomy and/or cinacalcet. Further studies are needed to establish the optimal treatment for posttransplant hyperparathyroidism.

Increasing rates of parathyroidectomy to treat secondary hyperparathyroidism in dialysis patients with Medicare coverage.

BACKGROUND: Secondary hyperparathyroidism affects nearly all patients with renal failure on dialysis. Medical treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism has considerably evolved over the past 2 decades, with parathyroidectomy reserved for severe cases. The primary objective of our study was to understand how trends in medical treatments affected parathyroidectomy rates in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism on dialysis. METHODS: We used the United States Renal Data System to identify 379,835 adult patients (age ≥18) who were on maintenance dialysis in the United States between 2006 and 2016 with Medicare as the primary payor and ascertained treatment for secondary hyperparathyroidism. Adjusted rate ratios for rates of parathyroidectomy were calculated using multivariable-adjusted Poisson regression. RESULTS: Of 379,835 secondary hyperparathyroidism patients, 4,118 (1.1%) underwent parathyroidectomy, 39,835 (10.5%) received cinacalcet, 243,522 (64.1%) received phosphate binders, 17,571 (4.6%) received vitamin D analogs, and 86,899 (22.9%) received no treatment during the 10 years of follow-up. Over the entire study period, there was a 3.5-fold increase in the use of calcimimetics and a 3.4-fold increase in rates of parathyroidectomy. Compared to 2006 through 2009, utilization of parathyroidectomy increased 52% (adjusted rate ratio = 1.52, 95% confidence interval: 1.39-1.65) between 2010 and 2013 and by 106% (adjusted rate ratio = 2.06, 95% confidence interval: 1.90-2.24) between 2014 and 2016. The greatest increase in parathyroidectomy utilization occurred in younger patients (age 18-64 years), Black patients, female patients, those living in higher poverty neighborhoods, those listed for kidney transplant, and those who live in the Southern region of the United States. CONCLUSION: Despite the evolution of medical treatments and an increase in the use of calcimimetics to treat secondary hyperparathyroidism, parathyroidectomy rates have been steadily increasing among dialysis patients with Medicare coverage.

Cinacalcete para o tratamento de pacientes com hiperparatireoidismo secundário à doença renal crônica estágio 5D / Cinacalcet for the treatment of patients with hyperparathyroidism secondary to kidney disease chronic stage 5d

INTRODUÇÃO: O hiperparatireoidismo secundário (HPTS) à doença crônica renal (DRC) é caracterizado por elevados níveis séricos de paratormônio (PTH), hiperplasia das glândulas paratireoides, doença óssea de alto remanejamento e doença cardiovascular. O nível de PTH considerado adequado para pacientes com DRC estágio 5D está situado entre 150 e 300 pg/ml ou duas a nove vezes o valor limite do método de dosagem. Segundo o censo da Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia (SBN), em 2020, estima-se que 144.779 pacientes se encontram em tratamento dialítico no Brasil. Destes, aproximadamente 18% apresentavam níveis de PTH acima de 600 pg/mL em 2019, enquanto em 2014 eram em torno de 26%, sugerindo que houve certo impacto na redução dos níveis de PTH com a incorporação do paricalcitol e cinacalcete e implementação do PCDT em 2017. Para a redução dos níveis do PTH, estão disponíveis no mercado brasileiro três classes de medicamentos: ativadores não seletivos do receptor da vitamina D (calcitriol e alfacalcidol), ativadores seletivos de VDR (paricalcitol) e calcimi

Cinacalcet and gastrointestinal bleeding risk in patients receiving hemodialysis.

PURPOSE: Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) is common among dialysis patients, and calcimimetics are a mainstay of treatment. This study assessed whether cinacalcet use is associated with gastrointestinal bleeding in a large hemodialysis cohort. METHODS: A linked database of clinical records and medical claims for patients receiving hemodialysis in a large dialysis organization, 2007-2010, was used. A nested case-control study was performed among patients aged ≥18 years who had received hemodialysis for ≥90 days, had Medicare Parts A, B, and D coverage for ≥1 year, and had clinical evidence of SHPT (parathyroid hormone >300 pg/mL). Cases were those who experienced death or hospitalization caused by gastrointestinal bleeding. Each case was matched to up to four controls. Exposure was measured by any cinacalcet use, current use, past use, cumulative exposure days, and cumulative dosage. Conditional logistic models were used to assess the association. RESULTS: Of 48 437 patients included, 2570 experienced gastrointestinal bleeding events (2498 non-fatal, 72 fatal), and 2465 (2397 non-fatal, 68 fatal) were matched to 9500 controls; 17.2% of cases and 15.8% of controls had cinacalcet exposure and 11.1% of both cases and controls had current use. The adjusted odds ratios (95% CI) of gastrointestinal bleeding for any use, current use, and past use of cinacalcet were 1.04 (0.91-1.19), 0.97 (0.83-1.13), and 1.22 (0.99-1.50), respectively, with no use as the reference. CONCLUSION: The results do not suggest an elevated risk of gastrointestinal bleeding resulting in hospitalization or death for hemodialysis patients exposed to cinacalcet.

Paricalcitol versus Calcitriol + Cinacalcet for the Treatment of Secondary Hyperparathyroidism in Chronic Kidney Disease in China: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Background: Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is a global chronic disease with increasing prevalence in recent years, particularly CKD accompanied by Secondary Hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) leads to reduced quality of life, increased mortality, a considerable economic burden for patients and society. The aim of this study was to investigate the cost-effectiveness analysis of paricalcitol vs. calcitriol + cinacalcet for CKD patients with SHPT in China in 2020. Methods: A Markov model was conducted employing data derived from published literature, clinical trials, official sources, and tertiary public hospital data in China, based on a 10-year horizon from the perspective of the healthcare system. Calcitriol + Cinacalcet was used as the reference group. CKD stage 5 (CKD-5) dialysis patients suffering from SHPT were included in the study. Effectiveness was measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The discount rate (5%) was applied to costs and effectiveness. Sensitivity analysis was performed to confirm the robustness of the findings. Results: The base case analysis demonstrated that Patients treated with paricalcitol could gain an increase in utility (0.183 QALYs) and require fewer expenditures (6925.612 yuan). One-way sensitivity analysis was performed to showed that impact factors were the price of cinacalcet, the hospitalization costs of patients with paricalcitol and calcitriol, the costs and utilities of hemodialysis and the costs of calcitriol, the costs of paricalcitol regardless of period. Probabilistic simulation analysis displayed when willingness-to-pay was ¥217113, the probability that Paricalcitol was dominant is 96.20%. Conclusion: The results showed that paricalcitol administrated to treat patients diagnosed with Secondary hyperparathyroidism in Chronic Kidney Disease, compared to calcitriol and cinacalcet, might be dominant in China.

Judicialização do cinacalcete no estado do Rio de Janeiro / Judicialization of cinacalcet in Rio de Janeiro State

Objetivo: Analisar a judicialização do cinacalcete no estado do Rio de Janeiro e estimar o seu impacto no orçamento do estado do Rio de Janeiro no ano de 2015. Métodos: Estudo transversal descritivo que analisou os pareceres técnicos emitidos pelo Núcleo de Assessoria Técnica em Ações de Saúde do Tribunal de Justiça do Rio de Janeiro entre 2009 e 2016. Realizou-se uma busca no banco de licitações da Secretaria de Estado de Saúde do Rio de Janeiro para encontrar o valor pago por esse medicamento em 2015. Resultados: Entre 2009 e 2015, esse núcleo elaborou 23.852 pareceres, com 1.553 relacionados ao cinacalcete, sendo 359 em 2015. Entre os autores, 88% residiam na capital deste estado, 50,4% eram mulheres, 46% tinham renda entre 1 e 3 salários mínimos. A decisão judicial foi favorável ao autor em 100% dos processos. Conclusão: Em 2015, foram gastos cerca de 3,7 milhões de reais para compra desse medicamento, o que equivale a 2,5% dos recursos destinados à assistência farmacêutica do estado do Rio de Janeiro neste ano, caracterizando um elevado impacto no orçamento da saúde

Objective: Analyze the judicialization of cinacalcet in Rio de Janeiro and estimate its impact on the budget of Rio de Janeiro State in 2015. Methods: It is a cross sectional study that analyzed the technical reports issued by the Technical Advisory Core of the Court of Justice in Rio de Janeiro between 2009 and 2016. It was realized a search in the bids database of Health Secretary of Rio de Janeiro state to define the value spent for this drug in 2015. Results: Between 2009 and 2015, the Core Technical Advisory prepared 23,852 reports, 1,553 of them related to cinacalcet, 359 in 2015. Among the authors, 88% were living in the capital of Rio de Janeiro, 50.4% were women, 46% with income between 1 and 3 minimum wages. The court decision was favorable to the author in 100% of the processes. Conclusion: In 2015, about R$ 3.7 million were spent, which is equivalent to 2.5% of the resources destined to pharmaceutical assistance in Rio de Janeiro at that year, causing a high impact in the health's budget

Association Between Treatment of Secondary Hyperparathyroidism and Posttransplant Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) affects nearly all patients on maintenance dialysis therapy. SHPT treatment options have considerably evolved over the past 2 decades but vary in degree of improvement in SHPT. Therefore, we hypothesize that the risks of adverse outcomes after kidney transplantation (KT) may differ by SHPT treatment. METHODS: Using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and Medicare claims data, we identified 5094 adults (age ≥18 y) treated with cinacalcet or parathyroidectomy for SHPT before receiving KT between 2007 and 2016. We quantified the association between SHPT treatment and delayed graft function and acute rejection using adjusted logistic models and tertiary hyperparathyroidism (THPT), graft failure, and death using adjusted Cox proportional hazards; we tested whether these associations differed by patient characteristics. RESULTS: Of 5094 KT recipients who were treated for SHPT while on dialysis, 228 (4.5%) underwent parathyroidectomy, and 4866 (95.5%) received cinacalcet. There was no association between treatment of SHPT and posttransplant delayed graft function, graft failure, or death. However, compared with patients treated with cinacalcet, those treated with parathyroidectomy had a lower risk of developing THPT (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.35-0.89) post-KT. Furthermore, this risk differed by dialysis vintage (Pinteraction = 0.039). Among patients on maintenance dialysis therapy for ≥3 y before KT (n = 3477, 68.3%), the risk of developing THPT was lower when treated with parathyroidectomy (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.79). CONCLUSIONS: Parathyroidectomy should be considered as treatment for SHPT, especially in KT candidates on maintenance dialysis for ≥3 y. Additionally, patients treated with cinacalcet for SHPT should undergo close surveillance for development of tertiary hyperparathyroidism post-KT.

Timing of parathyroidectomy for tertiary hyperparathyroidism with end-stage renal disease: A cost-effectiveness analysis.

BACKGROUND: Tertiary hyperparathyroidism associated with end-stage renal disease is characterized by progression from secondary hyperparathyroidism to an autonomous overproduction of parathyroid hormone that leads to adverse health outcomes. Rates of parathyroidectomy (PTX) have decreased with the use of calcimimetics. Optimal timing of PTX in relation to kidney transplant remains controversial. We aimed to identify the most cost-effective strategy for patients with tertiary hyperparathyroidism undergoing kidney transplant. METHODS: We constructed a patient level state transition microsimulation to compare 3 management schemes: cinacalcet with kidney transplant, cinacalcet with PTX before kidney transplant, or cinacalcet with PTX after kidney transplant. Our base case was a 55-year-old on dialysis with tertiary hyperparathyroidism awaiting kidney transplant. Outcomes, including quality-adjusted life years, surgical complications, and mortality, were extracted from the literature, and costs were estimated using Medicare reimbursement data. RESULTS: Our base case analysis demonstrated that cinacalcet with PTX before kidney transplant was dominant, with a lesser cost of $399,287 and greater quality-adjusted life years of 10.3 vs $497,813 for cinacalcet with PTX after kidney transplant (quality-adjusted life years 9.4) and $643,929 for cinacalcet with kidney transplant (quality-adjusted life years 7.4). CONCLUSION: Cinacalcet alone with kidney transplant is the least cost-effective strategy. Patients with end-stage renal disease-related tertiary hyperparathyroidism should be referred for PTX, and it is most cost-effective if performed prior to kidney transplant.

Trends in Mineral Metabolism Treatment Strategies in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis in the United States.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: With multiple medications indicated for mineral metabolism, dialysis providers can apply various strategies to achieve target phosphate and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels. We describe common prescribing patterns and practice variation in mineral metabolism treatment strategies over the last decade. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: In a cohort of adults initiating hemodialysis at Dialysis Clinic, Inc. facilities, we assessed prescriptions of vitamin D sterols, phosphate binders, and cinacalcet longitudinally. To identify the influence of secular trends in clinical practice, we stratified the cohort by dialysis initiation year (2006-2008, 2009-2011, and 2012-2015). To measure practice variation, we estimated the median odds ratio for prescribing different mineral metabolism treatment strategies at 12 months post-dialysis initiation across facilities using mixed effects multinomial logistic regression. Sensitivity analyses evaluated strategies used after detection of first elevated PTH. RESULTS: Among 23,549 incident patients on hemodialysis, there was a decline in vitamin D sterol-based strategies and a corresponding increase in strategies without PTH-modifying agents (i.e., phosphate binders alone or no mineral metabolism medications) and cinacalcet-containing treatment strategies between 2006 and 2015. The proportion with active vitamin D sterol-based strategies at dialysis initiation decreased across cohorts: 15% (2006-2008) to 5% (2012-2015). The proportion with active vitamin D sterol-based strategies after 18 months of dialysis decreased across cohorts: 52% (2006-2008) to 34% (2012-2015). The odds of using individual strategies compared with reference (active vitamin D sterol with phosphate binder) varied from 1.5- to two-fold across facilities in 2006-2008 and 2009-2011 cohorts, and increased to two- to three-fold in the 2012-2015 cohort. Findings were similar in sensitivity analyses starting from first elevated PTH measurement. CONCLUSIONS: Over time, mineral metabolism management involved less use of vitamin D sterol-based strategies, greater use of both more conservative and cinacalcet-containing strategies, and increased practice variation, suggesting growing equipoise.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of cinacalcet for haemodialysis patients with moderate-to-severe secondary hyperparathyroidism in China: evaluation based on the EVOLVE trial.

OBJECTIVE: As the cost-effectiveness evaluation of cinacalcet and conventional therapy in China has not been reported, the objective of this study was to make a pharmacoeconomic evaluation of cinacalcet specific to the Chinese healthcare setting in patients with moderate-to-severe secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) undergoing dialysis. DESIGNS: Data from Evaluation of Cinacalcet Therapy to Lower Cardiovascular Events trial were used for this analysis. A semi-Markov model was constructed to estimate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and lifetime costs in cinacalcet plus conventional therapy (cinacalcet strategy) compared with conventional therapy (standard strategy), in patients with moderate-to-severe SHPT undergoing dialysis. Treatment effect estimates from the unadjusted intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis and covariate-adjusted ITT analysis were used as the main analyses. Model sensitivity to variations in individual inputs and overall decision uncertainty were assessed through probabilistic sensitivity analyses. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) as measured by cost per QALY gained. RESULTS: The ICER for cinacalcet strategy was US$44 400 per QALY gained using the covariate-adjusted ITT analysis. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis suggested a 46.2% chance of the ICER being below a willingness-to-pay threshold of US$26 508. Treatment effects from unadjusted ITT analysis yielded an ICER of US$87 210 per QALY. The model was most sensitive to the treatment effect on mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Existing evidence does not support the cost-effectiveness of cinacalcet strategy in patients with moderate-to-severe SHPT undergoing dialysis when applying a willingness-to-pay threshold of US$26 508 per QALY, whether it is using the treatment effect from covariate-adjusted ITT analysis or unadjusted ITT analysis.

Eficacia y seguridad de cinacalcet en el tratamiento de pacientes adultos con hiperparatiroidismo primario con hipercalcemia persistente pese a terapia quirúrgica / Efficacy and safety of cinacalcet in the treatment of adult patients with primary hyperparathyroidism with persistent hypercalcaemia despite surgical therapy

INTRODUCCIÓN: El presente dictamen expone la evaluación de la eficacia y seguridad de cinacalcet 30mg administrada VO, para el tratamiento de pacientes adultos con diagnóstico de Hiperparatiroidismo Primario (HPTP) con hipercalcemia persistente pese a terapia quirúrgica (Paratiroidectomía). El hiperparatiroidismo primario (HPTP) es una enfermedad que involucra a una o más glándulas paratiroides, responsables de la producción de la hormona paratiroidea (PTH) y que afecta directamente el control normal de los niveles de calcio en sangre. Un paciente con HPTP produce altos niveles de PTH y calcio en sangre (hipercalcemia) así como altos niveles de calcio en orina. Durante la hipercalcemia, el calcio liberado de los huesos con el tiempo puede desencadenar en osteoporosis, cálculos renales y reducción en la función renal. Este trastorno se da en aproximadamente 1 % de la población adulta, pero afecta a más del 2 % de la misma después de los 55 años y especialmente a mujeres. La paratiroidectomía (PTx) es la terapia de elección para el HPTP con una tasa de curación cercana al 95 %. Esta consiste en una intervención quirúrgica para extraer una o más glándulas paratiroides, realizando previamente un diagnóstico y evaluación por imágenes. No obstante, existe una proporción de pacientes que no responden a la terapia quirúrgica, persistiendo con la sintomatología propia de la enfermedad y la hipercalcemia, los cuales son diagnosticados como pacientes con terapia quirúrgica fallida (PTx fallida) o fracaso quirúrgico. Actualmente, en EsSalud no se cuenta con un tratamiento farmacológico alternativo para dichos pacientes, en quienes la terapia convencional y de mayor beneficio (i.e., PTx) no funciona. Es por ello que existe la necesidad de evaluar otras alternativas farmacológicas que podrían ser de beneficio para éstos pacientes. METODOLOGÍA: Se llevó a cabo una búsqueda sistemática de la literatura con respecto a la eficacia y seguridad de Cinacalcet para el tratamiento de pacientes adultos con hiperparatiroidismo primario con hipercalcemia persistente pese a terapia quirúrgica. Se empleó además un motor de búsqueda para las bases de datos de PubMed-Medline, the Cochrane Library, LILACS y SciELO. La búsqueda se enfocó en guías de práctica clínica (GPC), evaluaciones de tecnologías sanitarias (ETS) y revisiones sistemáticas (RS) con o sin meta-análisis (MA), identificándose términos en lenguaje simple, así como términos MeSH2 relacionados a la población de interés, la intervención según la pregunta PICO especificada". RESULTADOS: Los resultados se han obtenido a partir de los desenlaces que se encuentran en la pregunta PICO. No se incluyeron, por ningún motivo, resultados que no están enmarcados en la pregunta PICO. De acuerdo con la pregunta PICO, se llevó a cabo una búsqueda de evidencia científica relacionada al uso de Cinacalcet como tratamiento de pacientes con HPTP con Hipercalcemia persistente pese a terapia quirúrgica. En la presente sinopsis se describe la evidencia disponible según el tipo de publicación, siguiendo lo indicado en los criterios de elegibilidad (GPC, ETS, RS, MA y ECA fase III). CONCLUSIONES: El presente dictamen preliminar tuvo como objetivo evaluar la evidencia disponible en relación a la eficacia y seguridad de cinacalcet 30 mg VO para el tratamiento de pacientes con HPTP con hipercalcemia persistente pese a terapia quirúrgica.  Luego de realizar una búsqueda sistemática de la literatura, se identificaron y consideraron para el presente dictamen 4 GPC, una ETS y un solo ECA que evaluaron la eficacia de cinacalcet en pacientes con HPTP y con hipercalcemia no quirúrgicos. Tres de estas GPC coinciden en que cinacalcet es una opción terapéutica para el tratamiento de pacientes con HPTP con hipercalcemia que no se someten a terapia quirúrgica por algunas de las razones antes mencionada; y una GPC no reportó ninguna recomendación sobre el uso de cinacalcet u otro tratamiento más allá que realizar procedimientos más invasivos a fin evaluar mejor al paciente y buscar otras causas de hiperparatiroidismo secundario. Así mismo, la ETS elaborada por el NHS del Reino Unido, aprueba la disponibilidad del uso de cinacalcet para pacientes con HPTP con PTx fallida como opción terapéutica frente a la falla de la terapia convencional. El ECA desarrollado por Peacock, muestra la eficacia de cinacalcet comparada con placebo para la disminución de los niveles de calcio sérico llevándolo a niveles normales (8.5 ­ 10.5 mg/dl) y una reducción de 0.5 mg/dl (0.12 mmol/litro) del valor basal, estadísticamente significativos, mostrando que en el grupo que recibió cinacalcet los niveles de calcio bajaron hasta estar dentro de ,os valores normales dentro de las primeras 2 semanas y manteniéndose constante a lo largo de todo el periodo de seguimiento a diferencia del grupo placebo que mantuvo la hipercalcemia a lo largo del seguimiento (10.9 mng/dl). Se reportaron efectos adversos leves como náuseas y vómitos, los cuales fueron de igual proporción entre el grupo de intervención y el grupo control. Y que a pesar de las limitaciones existentes cinacalcet ofrece una alternativa de tratamiento para estos pacientes. Existe una proporción de pacientes que, a pesar de someterse a PTx, la terapia de elección para HPTP con una tasa de curación cercana al 95%, persiste con hipercalcemia. Frente a ello, actualmente EsSalud no cuenta con alguna alternativa de tratamiento farmacológico para controlar los niveles de calcio de manera gradual y segura, cuando la PTx es fallida, más allá de un seguimiento y evaluación constante del paciente por lo que surge la necesidad de evaluar otras alternativas de tratamientos. Consideramos en ese sentido, que a pesar de las limitaciones que pueda presentar la evidencia encontrada y teniendo el antecedente de aprobación de uso de cinacalcet para el tratamiento de hipercalcemia en pacientes con HPTS en la institución, se tiene experiencia de uso de este fármaco. Así podemos concluir que, cinacalcet supondría una alternativa de tratamiento para el control de los pacientes con HPTP que no responden a terapia quirúrgica. Por lo expuesto, el Instituto de Evaluaciones de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación ­ IETSI aprueba el uso de cinacalcet para el manejo de los pacientes con diagnóstico de HPTP con hipercalcemia persistente pese a terapia quirúrgica. La vigencia del presente dictamen preliminar es de un año a partir de la publicación. Así, la continuación de dicha aprobación estará sujeta a los resultados obtenidos de los pacientes que reciban este tratamiento, a los reportes de seguridad que puedan surgir durante farmacovigilancia activa y nueva evidencia que pueda surgir en el tiempo.

Treatment strategy of end stage renal disease-related hyperparathyroidism before, during, and after the era of calcimimetics.

BACKGROUND: Since 2004, end-stage renal disease related hyperparathyroidism patients are treated mainly with cinacalcet, which ceased to be subsidized through the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme in 2015. We aimed to investigate the impact of these changes on the treatment strategy in the Australian end-stage renal disease population. METHODS: The following groups were formed according to the date of parathyroidectomy: A, before calcimimetics; B, during the era of calcimimetics; and C, after cinacalcet removal by the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. The primary outcome was time from start of dialysis to parathyroidectomy. Regression analysis was used to examine trends in parathyroidectomy rates. RESULTS: Between 1998 and 2016, 195 parathyroidectomies were performed. Median time to referral was 69 (33-123), 67 (31-110) and 44 (23-102) months for groups A, B, and C, respectively (P = .55). Parathyroidectomy rates increased throughout the years (CI 0.09-1.13, R2=0.27, P = .02). A trend toward a dip in parathyroidectomy rates was seen during the era of cinacalcet (P = .08). Median preoperative parathyroid hormone levels increased significantly (842 [418-1,553] versus 1,040 [564-1,810] versus 1,350 [1,037-1,923] pg/mL, for groups A, B, and C, respectively [P < .01]). CONCLUSION: Parathyroidectomy rates seem to vary according to the availability of cinacalcet. This change in treatment strategy is accompanied with increased preoperative parathyroid hormone levels, reflecting delayed surgery and increased disease severity.

Chiral capillary zone electrophoresis in enantioseparation and analysis of cinacalcet impurities: Use of Quality by Design principles in method development.

A capillary electrophoresis method for the simultaneous determination of the enantiomeric purity and of impurities of the chiral calcimimetic drug cinacalcet hydrochloride has been developed following Quality by Design principles. The scouting phase was aimed to select the separation operative mode and to identify a suitable chiral selector. Among the tested cyclodextrins, (2-carboxyethyl)-ß-cyclodextrin and (2-hydroxypropyl)-γ-cyclodextrin (HPγCyD) showed good chiral resolving capabilities. The selected separation system was solvent-modified capillary zone electrophoresis with the addition of HPγCyD and methanol. Voltage, buffer pH, methanol concentration and HPγCyD concentration were investigated as critical method parameters by a multivariate strategy. Critical method attributes were represented by enantioresolution and analysis time. A Box-Behnken Design allowed the contour plots to be drawn and quadratic and interaction effects to be highlighted. The Method Operable Design Region (MODR) was identified by applying Monte-Carlo simulations and corresponded to the multidimensional zone where both the critical method attributes fulfilled the requirements with a desired probability π≥90%. The working conditions, with the MODR limits, corresponded to the following: capillary length, 48.5cm; temperature, 18°C; voltage, 26kV (26-27kV); background electrolyte, 150mM phosphate buffer pH 2.70 (2.60-2.80), 3.1mM (3.0-3.5mM) HPγCyD; 2.00% (0.00-8.40%) v/v methanol. Robustness testing was carried out by a Plackett-Burman matrix and finally a method control strategy was defined. The complete separation of the analytes was obtained in about 10min. The method was validated following the International Council for Harmonisation guidelines and was applied for the analysis of a real sample of cinacalcet hydrochloride tablets.

[New scenarios in secondary hyperparathyroidism: etelcalcetide. Position paper of Nephrologists form Lombardy].

Bone mineral abnormalities (defined as Chronic Kidney Disease Mineral Bone Disorder; CKD-MBD) are prevalent and associated with a substantial risk burden and poor prognosis in CKD population. Several lines of evidence support the notion that a large proportion of patients receiving maintenance dialysis experience a suboptimal biochemical control of CKD-MBD. Although no study has ever demonstrated conclusively that CKD-MBD control is associated with improved survival, an expanding therapeutic armamentarium is available to correct bone mineral abnormalities. In this position paper of Lombardy Nephrologists, a summary of the state of art of CKD-MBD as well as a summary of the unmet clinical needs will be provided. Furthermore, this position paper will focus on the potential and drawbacks of a new injectable calcimimetic, etelcalcetide, a drug available in Italy since few months ago.

A Decision-Analytic Model to Assess the Cost-Effectiveness of Etelcalcetide vs. Cinacalcet.

INTRODUCTION: Etelcalcetide is a novel intravenous calcimimetic for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) in haemodialysis patients. The clinical efficacy and safety of etelcalcetide (in addition to phosphate binders and vitamin D and/or analogues [PB/VD]) was evaluated in three phase III studies, including two placebo-controlled trials and a head-to-head study versus the oral calcimimetic cinacalcet. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop a decision-analytic model for economic evaluation of etelcalcetide compared with cinacalcet. METHODS: We developed a life-time Markov model including potential treatment effects on mortality, cardiovascular events, fractures, and subjects' persistence. Long-term efficacy of etelcalcetide was extrapolated from the reduction in parathyroid hormone (PTH) in the phase III trials and the available data from the outcomes study in cinacalcet (EVOLVE trial). Etelcalcetide was compared with cinacalcet, both in addition to PB/VD. We applied unit costs averaged from five European countries and a range of potential etelcalcetide pricing options assuming parity price to weekly use of cinacalcet and varying it by a 15 or 30% increase. RESULTS: Compared with cinacalcet, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of etelcalcetide was €1,355 per QALY, €24,521 per QALY, and €47,687 per QALY for the three prices explored. The results were robust across the probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Our modelling approach enabled cost-utility assessment of the novel therapy for SHPT based on the observed and extrapolated data. This model can be used for local adaptations in the context of reimbursement assessment.

Custos do tratamento do hiperparatireoidismo secundário à doença renal crônica, com cinacalcete ou paratireoidectomia, para pacientes não controlados com a terapia clínica convencional sob a perspectiva do Sistema Único de Saúde / Secondary hyperparathyroidism treatment costs with cinacalcet or PTX, for uncontrolled patients with conventional clinical therapy under Brazilian Public Health System perspective

Objetivos: Estimar a população elegível para o tratamento de pacientes com hiperparatireoidismo secundário (HPTS), não controlados com terapia convencional, bem como avaliar a utilização de recursos para o tratamento dessa população com cinacalcete ou paratireoidectomia (PTX). Métodos: Utilização da técnica Delphi por painel de especialistas. A pesquisa foi realizada utilizando questionário estruturado, enviado por meio eletrônico aos especialistas, e seguida de encontro presencial. Os custos foram obtidos de bases de dados governamentais. Apenas custos médicos diretos foram incluídos, sob a perspectiva do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) (em reais no ano de 2014). Os dados foram avaliados pelo Microsoft Excel versão 2013. Resultados: A população no cenário de mundo real indicada para o tratamento com cinacalcete foi de 7.705 pacientes. Já a população real encaminhada para a PTX foi de 7.691 pacientes, sendo esse número 76,3% maior que a população ideal com indicação de PTX, que foi de 1.822 pacientes. O custo estimado do tratamento com cinacalcete foi de R$ 27.712,95 (considerando a dose recomendada em bula para cinacalcete, de 30 a 180 mg/ dia) e de R$ 16.841,85 para PTX (incluindo os períodos pré e pós-cirúrgico). A análise de sensibilidade foi baseada na dose média de cinacalcete, conforme o estudo EVOLVE (66,8 mg/dia). Nesse cenário, o custo do tratamento com cinacalcete foi de R$ 11.924,13 (57% menor que o cenário com a dose de bula). Conclusão: No cenário SUS, o número de pacientes encaminhados para PTX foi 76,3% maior que os idealmente indicados à cirurgia, o que ocorre devido à falta de opções terapêuticas.

Objectives: To estimate patient management patterns, associated medical resource utilization and use of cinacalcet for secondary hyperparathyroidism in chronic hemodialysis patients and much uncontrolled with conventional treatment, in the Unified Healthcare System (SUS) setting, in 2014. Methods: An expert panel was carried using the Delphi technique. The research was done by structured and unambiguous questionnaires that were sent by email to the entire Delphi panel, followed by a face meeting. Expense inputs were mainly obtained from government fee schedules and pharmaceutical price tables. Only medical direct costs were included under the perspective of SUS [in 2014 Brazilian Real (BRL)]. Data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel Worksheet version 2013. Results: The eligible population to cinacalcet treatment was 9,513 patients. Considering an ideal scenario, this number goes to 7,705 patients. The estimated population for parathyroidectomy was 7,691 patients in a real scenario and 1,822 in an ideal scenario (76.3% more patients than the ideally suited to the procedure). The estimated annual cost with cinacalcet treatment is 27,712.95 BRL (considering the label dose for cinacalcet) and 16,841.85 BRL for parathyroidectomy (including pre and post-operative period), respectively. A sensitivity analysis was performed considering the cost of cinacalcet treatment using the drug's dose of EVOLVE study (66.8 mg). This scenario showed a total cost of 11,924.13 BRL (57% less than label dose scenario). Conclusion: 76.3% more patients are indicated to the surgery due the absence of other therapeutic options for management of secondary hyperparathyroidism in chronic hemodialysis patients and much uncontrolled with conventional treatment, in the SUS setting.